Monthly Archives: March 2011

Radiation Doses

Posted by Jamie Thom on March 14, 2011
General, Japan / No Comments

Update: Boing Boing has a much more comprehensive article on this here: Radiation: Dose and Risk
Update: Excellent infographic for comparing levels.
Update: Mutant Frog’s Radiation safety update is also well worth checking out.

Radiation Dose is measured in milliRems or Siervets. 1 sievert = 100 000 millirem so it is not hard to convert them. I’ll use millirem here, but Japan more commonly uses siervets.

Here is a great wee note about levels…

Source: HOW DANGEROUS IS RADIATION?

In nearly all of our discussions about radiation, we will be considering doses below about 10,000 mrem, which is commonly referred to as low-level radiation.

We frequently hear stories about incidents in which the public is exposed to radiation; radioactive material falling off a truck; contaminated water leaking out of a tank or seeping out of a waste burial ground; a radioactive source used for materials inspection being temporarily misplaced; malfunctions in nuclear plants leading to releases of radioactivity; and so on. Perhaps a hundred of these stories over the past 45 years have received national television coverage. The thing I always look for in these stories is the radiation exposure in millirems, but it is hardly ever given. Eventually it appears in a technical journal, or I trace it down by calls to health officials. On a very few occasions it has been as high as 5-10 mrem, but in the great majority of cases it has been less than 1 mrem. In the Three Mile Island accident, average exposures in the surrounding area were 1.2 mrem — this drew the one-word banner headline “RADIATION” in a Boston newspaper. In the supposed leaks of radioactivity from a low-level waste burial ground near Moorhead, Kentucky, there were no exposures as high as 0.1 mrem; yet this was the subject of a three-part series in a Philadelphia newspaper6 bearing headlines “It’s Spilling All Over the U.S.,” “Nuclear Grave is Haunting KY,” and “There’s No Place to Hide.” In the highly publicized leak from a nuclear power plant near Rochester, New York, in 1982, no member of the public was exposed to as much as 0.3 mrem. Yet this was the top news story on TV network evening news for two days.

And unsurprisingly we are seeing the same thing now.

The dose level measured at the Fukushima plant itself yesterday was 120.4 millirem/hr. Now that sounds high, and it is – about the same as an abdomen xray (which is way more damaging than chest or dental). Sure you don’t want to have that kind of exposure (an abdomen xray an hour) for an extended time, but this level is only at the plant itself. Even at that level, you need 40 hours exposure to reach the maximum yearly recommended dose.

There are reports that the mighty US navy has turned the USS Ronald Reagan because they detected a “dose of radiation was about the same as one month’s normal exposure to natural background radiation”. No actual figure of course. 85 mrem per year is natural background exposure so we guess they saw 7.08 milliRems over a day? So about seven dental Xrays equivalent and 705 straight days is safe at that level.

Meanwhile there is still no sign of any rise in the local radiation in Tokyo, nor anywhere else that I could find reliable data for. If you are more than 3km away from Fukushima you are in no danger whatsoever.

The reports of radiation detections so far in Tokyo are in microSiervets, and are tiny. Again this infographic is very good.

Nuclear Safety at Fukushima

Posted by Jamie Thom on March 13, 2011
General, Japan / 8 Comments

Update 17th March 07:41 Tokyo
So we have potentially damaged containment vessels and significant fuel melt that will lead to radiological discharges are likely.
In Tokyo, the risk from radiation remains low. Beyond Japan, it remains unbelievably low!
If you are not near the plant, you are still OK.

Update 15th March 18:14 Tokyo

All the info below remains correct according to the available data. The lack of hard data is what is now making even me a little nervous: My current feelings on the situation.

The best info summary currently available is here on AltJapan and I agree with every word.


Older Updates

The situation is changing and many more sources with reasoned information have become available. I have added these at appropriate places or linked to them in the updates section at the bottom of the post. If you have not alreadf read Dr Josef Oehmen’s Why I am not worried about Japan’s nuclear reactors, please do.

I have also posted a separate note about Radiation Doses you may find interesting.

The new situation at Unit 2 merits its own separate wee update which is immediately below… separate wee post.


Original Post

Every foreign media outlet, and at least one in Japan that should know better, are engaging in rumour mongering and mis-information. This is making me angry because, while there is certainly cause to be concerned with the Fukushima plant, there is no need for the level of alarm and fear being created.

I therefore highly recommend that you change your sources of information to the following…

Continue reading…

Switch to our mobile site